|
||||
|
CANCER PAIN MANAGEMENT (Etiopathogenesis,
Assessment & Pharmacological Management)
Magnitude of the problem India
receives about 10 lakhs new cancer patients every year. As statistical
data suggest approximately 60-80% patients, when they are diagnosed, are
advanced cases and hence incurable. Often, their major symptom is
moderate to severe pain. According to present estimates about 56% cancer
patients in India require relief of symptoms (palliative care) at any
given time, however, only 28% are provided some sort of palliative care
before they die. There is an immediate need to address this issue at all
levels. Clinicians should reassure patients and their families that most
pain could be relieved safely & effectively. Clinicians should
assess patients and provide optimal relief throughout the course of
illness. Health professionals should be properly educated about pain and
its management in the treatment plan and encourage patients to be active
participants in pain management. State regulatory bodies should not
hamper the supply and appropriate use of opioid analgesics for cancer
pain. Clinicians should collaborate with patients and families tackling
the costs of the drugs and technologies in selecting pain management
strategies. Pain associated with cancer is frequently under-treated in
adults and children (1). The incidence of pain in patient with cancer
depends on the type and stage of the disease. At the time of diagnosis
and intermediate stages, 30% to 45% of patients experience severe pain.
In approximately 90% of patients, pain can be controlled through
relatively simple means. Because of cancer pain is a problem of
international scope, the World Health Organization (WHO) has urged that
every nation give high priority to establishing a cancer pain relief
policy. Surprisingly, Pain got its proper scientific definition in 1979
(by IASP) as "an unpleasant sensory & emotional experience due
to tissue damage or described in terms of that damage"(2). Importance of controlling cancer pain Pain control merits high priority for two reasons.
First, unrelieved pain causes unnecessary suffering (3). Because pain
diminishes activity, appetite, & sleep, it can further weaken
already debilitated patients. The psychological effect of cancer pain
can be devastating. Patients with cancer often loose hope when pain
emerges, believing that pain heralds the inexorable progress of a
feared, destructive, & fatal disease. Chronic unrelieved pain can
lead patients to reject active treatment & when their pain is
severe or they are depressed, to consider or commit suicide. Besides
mitigating suffering, pain control is important because, even when the
underlying disease process is stable, uncontrolled pain prevents
patients from working productively, enjoying recreation or taking
pleasure in their usual role in the family & society. Pain control
therefore merits a high priority not only for those with advanced
disease, but also for the patient whose condition is stable & whose
life expectancy is long. Ensuring good quality of life (QOL) in these
patients is paramount & has been the major focus of research. QOL
like pain has been conceptualized as a multidimensional phenomenon,
needing multidisciplinary care (4).
PAIN
AND CANCER Pain & cancer are not synonymous. ·
3/4 of patients experience pain ·
1/4 of patients do not experience pain Multiple, concurrent pains are common. ·
1/5 have one pain ·
4/5 have 2 or more pains ·
1/3 have 4 or more pains Pain in cancer may be: ·
caused by the cancer ·
caused by cancer treatment ·
related to the cancer/debility ·
caused by a concurrent disorder Most
common pain presentation in patients with cancer at Tata Memorial
Hospital Caused
by cancer: Bone
Soft
tissue
Viscera Related
to cancer/debility: Myofascial
Constipation
Muscle
spasm Caused
by a concurrent disorder: Low
back pain Caused
by cancer treatment:
Postoperative
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL
CLASSIFICATION OF PAIN
Functional: (‘physiological’) e.g. cramps, myofascial pain, colic
Organic (‘pathological’) e.g. traumatic, cancer
nerve compression (e.g. sciatica)
neural injury
- peripheral
(e.g. post herpetic neuralgia)
- central
sympathetically maintained pain (SMP) Peripheral neural injury pain is sometimes called
deafferentation pain ‘Somatic’ and ‘visceral’ are subdivisions of
nociceptive pain. Somatic Pain: localized & sharp pain. Neuropathic: Burning, sharp current like shooting
pain, tingling Cramp:
Occasional
cramp is a universal experience in cancer. Cramp is a commonly
associated with movement related to bone pain. Anxiety is a potent
exacerbating factor. Myofascial
pain (6): Assessment: Assess relief in relation to each pain. Whether pain
is somatic, visceral or neuropathic or mixed, assess different
components of each pain in "total pain”. If marked anxiety and/or
depression, proper psychological assessment of the patient is a must. Pain intensity: Pain score should be assessed on 0-10
scale, where 0 is “no pain” & 10 is “worst possible pain”.
Reassessment is a continuing necessity. Old pains may get worse &
new ones may develop. For pain caused by cancer, drugs usually give
adequate relief provided the right drug is administered, in the right
dose at the right time intervals. METHODS
OF PAIN RELIEF: Relief of pain may be achieved by the following
methods: ·
Explanation ·
Modification of pathological process ·
Elevation of pain threshold ·
Interruption of pain pathways ·
Modification of lifestyles; immobilization If disease-modifying treatment is being prescribed,
this does not mean that analgesics should be withheld. Best results are
usually obtained by adopting a multi-modality approach combining two or
more treatments. The use of analgesics & other drugs is simply one
way of elevating the patient’s pain threshold, thus reducing
perception of pain Goals
of pain management: ·
50% pain relief is considered good pain relief initially. ·
relief at night ·
relief at rest during the day ·
relief on movement (this is not always completely possible) Use
of analgesics: - “By mouth” The oral route is the preferred route for analgesics, including morphine. If patients are unable to take the drugs orally, the preferred alternative routes are rectal and subcutaneous. The relative potency ratio of oral morphine to rectal morphine is 1:1. Subcutaneous route may not be practical in patients with generalized edema, who develop erythema, soreness, or sterile abscesses with subcutaneous administration, with coagulation disorders, and with poor peripheral circulation(7). 0:P> -
“By clock” Persistent pain requires preventive therapy. This means
that analgesics should be given regularly & prophylactically. “As
needed” medication is irrational & inhumane. -
“By ladder” Use a three-step WHO analgesic ladder(8).
Step1: Non narcotics, NSAIDS Step2: Mild opioids, Step3: Strong opioids (Morphine)
Morphine is still the gold standard analgesic for use in moderate to
severe cancer pain. It may be started with 10 mg 4 hourly dose as per
the patient's physical status & age & pain intensity. Individual
variation does occur. Proper titration of morphine requires regular
follow up. It is also important to control side effects i.e.
constipation, nausea & vomiting, pruritis & rarely respiratory
depression. There is no upper dose limit in an otherwise systemically
fit patient Codeine may be used where morphine is not accessible.
Codeine + ibuprofen or paracetamol combination tablets may be prescribed
effectively and are available as over the counter (OTC) drugs.
Pharmacologically, pain in cancer can be divided into: 1.Opioid
responsive, i.e. pain which is relieved by opioids.2.Opioid
semi-responsive, i.e. pain which is best relieved by the concurrent
use of an opioid & an adjuvant drug. 3. Opioid-resistant,
i.e. pain which is not relieved by opioids but by other drugs e.g.
NSAIDS (Bone metastasis), antidepressants (Neuropathic pain), Steriods.
Dexamethasone 0.5 mg tabs.2 tds in tapering dose for 4 weeks or
methylprednisolone (mendrol) 4mg for 15 days may be quite useful in
spinal cord compression, elevated ICT, bone metastasis, intestinal
obstruction or plexopathy pain. “Opioid rotation”(9). Geriatric patients may accumulate morphine-6-glucuronide and normorphine metabolites because of reduced renal function, predisposing them to agitated confusion. Opioid rotation replaces one drug with equianalgesic doses of another; this practice may be helpful in morphine-induced confusion. Long-acting morphine may be converted to oxyocodone at an equianalgesic ratio of 2:1 or to transdermal fentanyl. “For
the individual”:
The right dose of an analgesic is the dose that relieves the pain. “Monitor
treatment”: The response to treatment must be monitored
to ensure that benefits of treatment are maximized & adverse effects
are minimized. “Use
adjuvant drugs”: A laxative is almost always necessary
with an opioid prescription. More than 50% of patients need an
antiemetic. NSAIDS drugs should be added with H2 receptor blockers or
proton pump inhibitors. COX-2 NSAIDS currently available in India like
Roficoxib & celecoxib may be safer as they do not cause gastritis
& platelet dysfunction. However even COX-2 be used with caution in
renal-compromised patients. Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) are very
useful adjuvants in majority of patients to provide psychological
uplift. Tab. Amitriptyline 25 mg at bedtime is usually the starting
dose. It should be avoided in cardiac patients. Side effects are dryness
of mouth, giddiness in the morning. Some patients continue to experience
pain on movement despite analgesics. Surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy
& Anesthetic approaches (nerve blocks) may sometimes be useful, in
controlling the pain optimally. Physiatric & psychologic methods are
used as good complimentary tools in relieving pain. The situation may
also be improved by suggesting modifications to the patient’s way of
life by using various rehabilitative methods. References: 1. Cleeland Cs, Gowin R, Hatfield AK. Et al Pain
& its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer. N Eng J Med
1994;330:592-96 2. Mersky H, Bogduk N, eds. Classification of chronic
pain 2 ed. Seattle IASP press, 1994 3. Cherny NI, Coyle N, Foley KM, Suffering in the
advanced cancer patient: a definition 7 taxonomy J palliat care
1994;10:57-70 4. Cella DF. Quality of life. Concepts &
definition J pain symptom manage 1994; 9: 186-192 5. Portenoy RK. Issues in the management of
neuropathic pain. In: Basbaum JM. ed. Towards a new pharmacotherapy of
pain, New York. John Wiley & sons.1991, pp393-416 6. Travell JG, Simons DG, Myofascial pain and
dysfunction, vol 2:Baltimore . William & wilkins 1992 7. Research in cancer pain and palliative care: http://www.whocancerpain.wisc.edu. 8. World health organization: cancer pain relief.2nd ed. With a guide to opioid availability. Geneva. World Health Organization 1996 9. Eric W. Anderson. Update: cancer pain management.
The Medical Journal of Allina (www.allina.com)
Vol 7 / No. 4/ Fall 19980:P>
|
||||